AliveCommerce / Capabilities / Take software off my plate
Nobody owns your application layer. Your MSP handles the network, each vendor handles their own product, and everything in between lands on whoever has the least capacity to refuse it. Usually an operations lead who never asked to be an administrator.
Tick what applies. The count changes what we'd recommend, and sometimes the recommendation is to do nothing yet.
Almost never carelessness. Usually the predictable result of a decision that made sense at the time.
People know to hire an MSP for infrastructure. There's no equivalent obvious answer for applications, so it defaults to whoever is closest.
Different departments, different years, different vendors. Nobody was ever given the whole picture, so nobody could be accountable for it.
Which covers their product, working as designed, in isolation. It doesn't cover whether your stack makes sense together, or whether you're paying twice for the same capability.
In this order, because doing them out of order is how these projects fail.
What you run, what it costs, where it overlaps, what's exposed. Usually the first time anyone has seen it on one page. We make nothing from the overlaps we find.
Configuration, users, updates, vendor liaison and the daily requests. The operations lead gets their week back, which is generally the whole point.
Most stacks contain duplication nobody has audited. Removing spend is a faster return than any new tool, and it's the first thing we look for.
Ownership isn't just keeping things running. Under Foundation we actively look for what's worth automating next, rather than waiting for you to ask.
Same team either way. The difference is whether this has an ending.
Three tiers depending on depth. Flex for credit blocks, Manage for unlimited support and administration, Foundation when you want active engineering too.
See Champion1When there's a specific piece of work first — a migration, a consolidation, an integration — before any ongoing arrangement makes sense.
What we buildThe stack review found two platforms doing the same job and a licence count that hadn't been audited in four years. That paid for the first year.
No. They own infrastructure, endpoints and security; we own the applications running on top. We work alongside MSPs regularly and refer to them, and publishing that boundary is why the arrangement works.
Sometimes, and we'll say so. One person can't cover ERP, CRM, integrations and reporting — but if your stack is narrow enough, a hire wins on cost and proximity. We've published that comparison.
Defined service levels covering response and resolution, and a rate review that moves the price in either direction based on how the relationship actually went. Both published before you sign.
You do. Code, configuration, documentation, credentials — all yours, documented as we go. If you leave, you leave with everything and we help with the handover.
We'll tell you which part of this we'd put on it, roughly what it costs, and whether it's worth doing at all — including when the honest answer is that you don't need us.
Start the Conversation