AliveCommerce / How we work
Every engagement is one of two shapes, across one of three layers of the business. That's the whole structure. This page exists so you can find your square on the grid in about thirty seconds, rather than reading five service pages to work it out.
Most firms sell one engagement shape and make every client fit it. We run two, because some work has an ending and some work doesn't.
A migration has a start, a finish and a budget. The application layer never finishes — neither does the website, or the way information moves through a business. Those need someone to own them, not a project plan.
We named the ownership models separately because they're genuinely different products with different buyers, not because we're several companies. Champion1, LiquidIQ and DARWIN are all AliveCommerce.
Named by what breaks, not by what we'd sell you to fix it.
SOPs, documentation, training, records, approvals — and the parts that were never written down because the person doing them has been there nineteen years.
When nobody owns it: key-person risk, slow onboarding, audit exposure, and the same question answered a hundred times a year.
ERP, CRM, field service, finance, work management, the integrations between them, and whatever was custom-built in 2014 by someone who has since left.
When nobody owns it: your MSP handles infrastructure, each vendor handles their own product, and the space between them belongs to nobody. That's where things quietly break.
The public site, the storefront, landing pages, the ordering experience, and the accessibility obligations attached to all of it.
When nobody owns it: the rebuild cycle. Launch, drift, decay, rebuild — and four years of unmade decisions each time.
We work fixed-budget, scope-controlled. The budget is set before anything starts, scope changes get surfaced and priced before anyone does the work, and there is no invoice you didn't see coming.
The objectivity part is concrete rather than a slogan: we take no vendor commissions and no referral fees on anything we recommend, and we will tell you when the answer is to buy nothing and keep what you have.
A fixed monthly fee, which means we make no more money by doing more work. A traditional agency profits from scope; we profit when your systems need less intervention. It's the only structure we've found where neither side has to take the other's word for it.
The fair objection is what stops us coasting. Two things, both agreed in writing rather than promised: defined service levels covering response and resolution, and a rate review that looks at how the relationship actually went and moves the price in either direction.
Two questions usually settle it. Answer them on the homepage and we'll point you at the square.
Our clients usually run 30 to 50 people in the office and often as many again in the field, the shop, the warehouse, or on the road. Headcount is a poor proxy for what we do.
What they have in common is either active operational pain, or the foresight to invest before the pain arrives. Most often it's the first one — something broke, someone left, or an auditor asked a question nobody could answer.
We work with owners and CEOs at the smaller end, and with COOs, operations directors, VPs of sales and growth, IT directors and continuous-improvement leads as the size goes up. Often all of them, eventually.
people, counting everyone — not just the office
We'll tell you which square of the grid it lands in, roughly what it costs, and whether it's worth doing at all — including when the honest answer is that you don't need us.
Start the Conversation